If you are considering becoming a 1M/1M premium member and would like to join our mailing list to receive ongoing information, please sign up here.

Subscribe to our Feed

Concur CEO Steve Singh (Part 6)

Posted on Saturday, Aug 11th 2007

Dealing with and properly addressing change is a substantial aspect of the success or failure of companies. Shifting to the on-demand model without any other examples to follow was visionary, but if implemented incorrectly could have been devastating as well.

SM: How did you change the channel at this point? You shifted to an on-demand model, you would have then had to make changes to the channel as well. SS: The changes were pervasive, and they were not related just to the channel.

First, the entire executive team had to change. If you look at the executive team back then, it was 17 people. At the time Mike Hilton and I were on the team, and all but Mike and I had to be changed out. You had to start thinking, fundamentally, as a services company and not a software company.

The way you built the software was different, the way you dealt with your hosting operations was different, the way you deliver the software was different, and the way you serviced it was different. The whole business model changed, and the whole sales model changed. Instead of sales executives who were used to selling big enterprise software deals, two deals a year and you make your number, we had to change the model to find sales executives who knew how to sell more deals per year to make. We then had to find sales executives out of companies like ADP and Paychex who were used to selling 20-30 deals per year to make their quota. Much more transactional sales.

SM: So you probably moved more towards telesales. SS: Yes, exactly right. We went from a 700 person company to a 300 person company, which then further went down to 250 over the course of the next 8 months and we started rebuilding from there.

SM: At that point you were focused purely as an expense management solution? SS: Yes, but in on-demand expense services.

[to be continued]

[Part 5]
[Part 4]
[Part 3]
[Part 2]
[Part 1]

This segment is part 6 in the series : Concur CEO Steve Singh
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Hacker News
() Comments

Featured Videos


Came across your site and had a giggle about the number of sales per year a Paychex rep needs to make to hit quota.

It’s more like 75-125 per year to keep your job. The “middle of the pack” reps (in core sales) are selling more like 185-210.

SPK Sunday, August 12, 2007 at 5:46 PM PT

Yes, pure transactional selling is just that, and Paychex is a pure transactional selling model now.

The number of transactions in that case tend to be high.

What’s so funny about it?

People who sell club memberships also operate in that mode. The low end of SME is more akin to consumer marketing / selling, more smaller sized transactions.

Sramana Mitra Monday, August 13, 2007 at 4:39 PM PT