categories

HOT TOPICS

Seed Capital

Harvard Business Review Series on the Seed Capital Gap

Posted on Thursday, Apr 17th 2014
Over the last few months, I wrote a series of articles for Harvard Business Review on the seed capital gap facing entrepreneurs. Below are links to the entire set:
How To Reduce ‘Infant Entrepreneur Mortality’
How Startups Overcome The Capital Gap
Can Crowdfunding Solve The Startup Capital Gap?
The Problem With Incubators and How To Solve Them
When Big Companies Support Startups, Both Make More Money
How To Fund Indian Startups
Startups: Before You Launch Your Product, Start with a Service
We hope to see you at the next Free 1M/1M Online Roundtable on Thursday at 8am Pacific.
Hacker News
() Comments

Crowdfunding Startups: Opportunities and Bottlenecks

Posted on Wednesday, Apr 9th 2014

There has been a bit of action for a while now in the crowdfunding world, and certain startups have been able to get themselves off the ground using the Kickstarter / Indiegogo style sites. By and large, these types of financings have gone to companies that are building physical products, digital games, etc. Fundings have also happened for some causes, films, books and art projects that are typically not businesses. Equity crowdfunding has been signed into law in the US through the JOBS Act, but it awaits the SECs directives on the precise rules governing the system. In Europe, it is legal and already in practice. Hopefully, other parts of the world will also start seeing the infrastructure develop shortly.

For our domain of focus, the primary concern is financing digital startups: technology and technology-enabled services. Typically, these are difficult to assess, high-risk companies, and amateur investors from the “crowd” are unlikely to be able to perform adequate due diligence to have a sophisticated investment thesis.

However, there is one category of investors who will have an excellent vantage point from which to assess new ventures.
>>>

Hacker News
() Comments

Buliding a Venture Scale Analytics Platform Company: Birst CEO, Brad Peters (Part 7)

Posted on Tuesday, Apr 1st 2014

Sramana Mitra: In that strategy, were you actually partnering with Salesforce and going to market through the AppExchange?

Brad Peters: We were. Salesforce is a fairly hands-off partner. I wouldn’t say that it was a huge help. That has generally been my experience talking to other people. You find Salesforce customers on your own and tell the story to them directly. AppExchange was a nice technical integration point. It wasn’t that great a marketing tool.

Sramana Mitra: I’ve heard big feedback on that. Some people have been very successful generating leads out of AppExchange and some have not. It sounds like in your case, it has not.

>>>

Hacker News
() Comments

Buliding a Venture Scale Analytics Platform Company: Birst CEO, Brad Peters (Part 6)

Posted on Monday, Mar 31st 2014

Sramana Mitra: Let’s talk about what happens after you did the reset. What was your go-to market strategy with the new horizontal product?

Brad Peters: We had to sit down and figure out what the go-to market strategy was going to be. There was a lot of experimentation. We couldn’t make our enterprise product available to everybody from day one. So we had to pick a small piece of it and make that available. It was not able to satisfy the entire market. We had to find little pieces of that marketplace that we could grow, expand, and drive. We tried a lot of value propositions – some of which worked, many didn’t. Ultimately, as we kept building the product and getting it richer and more robust, we continued to put more enterprise capabilities into the product. As we ultimately got those enterprise capabilities into the product, we started to compete in that main market. It was late 2010 when we really nailed it and things started to click. >>>

Hacker News
() Comments

Buliding a Venture Scale Analytics Platform Company: Birst CEO, Brad Peters (Part 5)

Posted on Sunday, Mar 30th 2014

Sramana Mitra: What was your original estimate of the TAM for your application in the financial services area? As the market was shifting, what did you estimate it down to that made you explore other verticals?

Brad Peters: The TAM for each application was probably $100 million. It had to be $100 million to get into it. The idea would be you could find multiple of these $100 million segments. We weren’t sure, but we figured that there are roughly 100 financial services institutions and 150 to 200 minor ones. If we could get a reasonable percentage of them, we’ll probably hit 50% of the TAM, or about $50 million. >>>

Hacker News
() Comments

Buliding a Venture Scale Analytics Platform Company: Birst CEO, Brad Peters (Part 4)

Posted on Saturday, Mar 29th 2014

Sramana Mitra: Was the seed that you got enough to get you to the next milestone or did you have to raise?

Brad Peters: We raised seed financing before we started. We couldn’t afford to make the mortgage payment without a little bit of seed financing. We got a little bit of seed financing from some VCs and paid ourselves next to nothing, just enough to keep the lights on.

Sramana Mitra: In terms of raising the seed money, what did you sell the VCs? What was the investment thesis that you sold the VCs?

>>>

Hacker News
() Comments

Buliding a Venture Scale Analytics Platform Company: Birst CEO, Brad Peters (Part 3)

Posted on Friday, Mar 28th 2014

Sramana Mitra: What did you do in 2005 when you started this company?

Brad Peters: We needed to do two things. We had to get some funding because we didn’t have personal savings to be able to survive very long. We needed some seed capital. We spent a lot of time thinking through markets where, with a single sale, we could get enough customer traction to fund the company for a period of time. >>>

Hacker News
() Comments

Buliding a Venture Scale Analytics Platform Company: Birst CEO, Brad Peters (Part 2)

Posted on Thursday, Mar 27th 2014

Sramana Mitra: You were at Siebel through that acquisition?

Brad Peters: No, I wasn’t. You could see the writing on the wall. Analytics was exploding. We were doing really well, but the rest of the company was not doing so well. It was actually shrinking. You could tell that the company was on a collision course with something else. It just wasn’t adapting to newer technologies and architectures. There were a couple of observations that came out of that experience. We had this analytics product that was doing really well, which was basically tackling the idea that normal business people in organizations need data to make decisions and that seemed to be something that was insatiable and was going to continue to grow for some time. There was huge demand for that. >>>

Hacker News
() Comments